Skip to content

BestWeb.lk

Evaluation Criteria

Home > Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria

An esteemed Panel of Judges, consisting of web experts, has been appointed with the responsibility of impartially evaluating each submission. This panel is dedicated to recognizing talent in an unbiased manner. Entries will undergo assessment based on the specified criteria and designated areas listed below.

Judging Criteria

Marks Allocation

20

20

Total

190

Technical Criteria

Completeness
  • All pages must be fully completed.
  • Contact information, including physical addresses, email, and telephone numbers, must be provided.
  • Regular updates to be done, as applicable based on the category.
  • Inclusion of a feedback/contact us form.
  • Implementation of a search facility.
  • Presence of a privacy policy for websites collecting or accepting any type of user data.
  • Inclusion of a cookies policy for websites collecting or accepting any type of user data or activity.
  • Utilization of simple and intuitive URLs.
  • Clear and well-organized menus.
  • Absence of broken links throughout the website.
  • Availability of links leading back to the home page.
  • Mandatory usage of the β€œHTTPS” protocol for eligibility in the BestWeb.lk competition.
  • Conformance to W3C standards.
  • Ensured browser compatibility and responsiveness.
  • Availability during the evaluation process.
  • Adherence to BestWeb.LK rules and regulations.
  • Compatibility with mobile devices.
  • Efficient loading time for optimal user experience.

Design Evaluation Criteria

Web site Design
  • Clear site architecture.
  • Well-defined site navigation structure, including a site map.
  • User-friendliness ensuring clarity of actions and processes.
  • Consistency in the use of standard headers, footers, menus, colors, etc.
  • Inclusion of Help and FAQ sections for user assistance.
  • Thoughtful page structure and layout, ensuring readability and comprehension without congestion.
  • Effective use of fonts, font sizes, and other text elements.
  • Appropriate and cohesive color scheme, including standard colors for links.
  • Balanced use of graphics without overloading.
  • Skillful utilization of HTML features, incorporating dynamic page content where applicable.
  • Availability of help features on individual pages.
  • Aesthetic appeal and professionalism, tailored to the nature of the site.

Content Evaluation Criteria

Quantity
  • Adequate volume of content suitable for the specific category.
  • Relevance of content to site objectives.
  • Precision and completeness of content.
  • Creativity that appeals to the intended audience.
  • Richness of content, including multimedia elements.
  • Attention to spelling and grammar.
  • Use of appropriate language for translations in Sinhala, Tamil, or English.
  • Visual image quality and clarity.
  • Quality of content in images, videos, and other multimedia elements.

Interaction Evaluation Criteria

Quality of Interaction with Users

(other than just clicking)

  • Level of interactivity provided on the website.
  • Clarity in the flow of transactions for users.
  • Meaningful error handling mechanisms.
  • Maintenance of strong passwords for CMS administrators.
  • Mandatory usage of the β€œHTTPS” protocol for eligibility in the BestWeb.LK competition.
  • Employment of updated modules to enhance security.
  • Comprehensive assessment of the quality and quantity of content, security measures, completeness, use of appropriate technology, user engagement, etc.

Multilingual / Community Purpose Evaluation Criteria

  • Eligibility limited to websites in Unicode standards for multilingual content.
  • Consideration for websites in languages other than the default.
  • For non-multilingual websites, assessment is focused on the fulfillment of community-oriented objectives and purposes.

Mobile Optimization Evaluation Criteria

  • Implementation of mobile-responsive design.
  • Ensuring the website is viewable on various devices.
  • Compatibility with different devices and screen sizes.
  • Evaluation of the loading time on mobile devices.

BONUS POINTS

  • Multilingual support (mandatory for government sites).
  • Accessibility features for disabled persons.
  • Incorporation of the latest technologies to enhance the site.
  • Development as a hard-coded website (without using CMS).
  • Inclusion of additional features.
  • Social network integration.

Penalty points (Negative marks)

  • Strict adherence to copyright laws; refraining from using copyrighted information and images without permission.
  • Avoidance of unwanted content, ads, plug-ins, or modules.
  • Restriction from using direct Google translations.
Skip to content